Thursday, April 23, 2015

Cops Removed Clothes From Young Woman’s Dead Body, Took Nude Photo

AUTHOR APRIL 22, 2015 6:36 PM

Photos taken by police on the night that 20-year-old Jessica Mejia was killed show that the young woman was in the back of the vehicle, when police arrived on the scene. According to the Chicago Tribune, which was given access to the photos, pictures taken while she was inside the vehicle show that Jessica Mejia was dressed in a pair of jeans and a white tee-shirt when she died. Subsequent images of the young woman, taken by Sheriff’s deputies in Cook County, Illinois, however, are the subject of a pending lawsuit.


According to the Chicago Tribune, photos provided to them by the family attorney show that police removed Jessica Mejia’s body from the vehicle. They then proceeded to undress her at the scene. Jessica’s naked body was laid out on a tarp. Police then photographed her naked corpse, which they manipulated into various poses.
The accident that took the young woman’s life occurred on New Year’s Eve, 2009. Shortly after, her family filed a lawsuit against the Cook County Sheriff’s Department. Jessica Mejia’s mother says she filed the suit to restore her daughter’s name.
According to the young woman’s mother, the officers who removed Jessica Mejia’s clothing at the scene of the accident created a false impression of what happened that night. Christian Mejia told the Chicago Tribune that:
“(People) think my daughter died from having sex, not from somebody being drunk and killing her. Because they took these photos, by the time everybody else got to the scene, all the ambulances and everybody else, she was partially naked because they made her naked… So the rumors, and the allegations … they made it believable.”
In December of 2010, a spokesman with the Cook County Sheriff’s Office denied that the pictures existed. Department spokesman Steve Patterson called the family’s claims “bizarre,” saying:
“There were multiple independent witnesses on the scene that night and crime scene photographs taken which would have prevented the scenario described from happening. We’re sorry for the family’s loss.”
This story certainly is bizarre, but the Sheriff’s department is no longer disputing the fact that the photos exist. Instead, they now claim that it was “medically necessary” for deputies to remove Jessica Mejia’s clothing and take nude photographs, as her dead body lay on the ground, sprawled out on a tarp. That claim seems beyond bizarre.
Don Perry, one of the family’s attorneys said in a statement to the Chicago Tribune:
“This was a young lady that just died and was treated with less dignity than a deer carcass you find on the side of the road.”
Here’s more on the story from WGN News, in Chicago.

*Featured image credit: video screen capture WGN News Chicago

Friday, April 17, 2015

Cop Sexually Assaults Teen Still Has Law Enforcement Certification

Omaha, Nebraska (TFC) – A cop took a deal in relation to charges of sexually assaulting a teenage girl and will not receive a felony conviction, will not have to register as a sex offender, will only serve a year in jail, and still currently has his law enforcement certification.
The rapist cop used a small amount of marijuana found during a traffic stop to extort a young lady into performing sexual acts. The officer made her boyfriend walk down to a nearby lake and wait for him to finish assaulting the girl. The former deputy, Cory Cooper, is 31 years old. The victim is 19.
The plea deal means he won’t have to go to trial on the charge of first-degree sexual assault. That was a felony that could have landed him in prison for twenty-five years. Instead, he’ll go to a jail where he knows the staff and will be protected from other inmates who would typically provide some form of real justice in a case like this. He will still be able to possess a firearm. There is nothing prohibiting him from being a police officer again after he serves the time for his minor crimes. In fact, he still has his law enforcement certification, even though that is expected to be stripped eventually.
Don’t worry though, he’ll be able to requalify for law enforcement work soon because he doesn’t have a felony record. Thanks to Douglas County Attorney Don Kleine, this man will be able to exit jail, obtain another job in law enforcement, and force another teenage girl to perform oral sex on him soon.
This is the American justice system. If you wonder why people riot, if you wonder why people celebrate when cops are killed, if you wonder why law enforcement in the United States is no longer respected and is viewed as an enemy of the people; remember the name Cory Cooper. It might be wise to remember the name of the prosecutor that protected the thin blue line as well. That name is Don Kleine.

Tuesday, March 3, 2015

Kentucky: Lawsuit Restored Against Cop Caught Lying About Traffic Stop

Video catches Kentucky State Trooper harassing motorist. US Court of Appeals rules cop can be sued for false arrest.

Lieutenant Phillip BurnettVideotape proved essential for Freddie Gregory, a motorist falsely accused of traffic violations by a high-ranking Kentucky State Police trooper. The US Court of Appeals on Friday allowed Gregory to pursue false arrest charges against Lieutenant Phillip Burnett.

Since February 2009, Lieutenant Burnett had stopped Gregory on three occasions under what the motorist considered to be bogus circumstances. The 53-year-old decided to install a video camera to document the harassment. The device was ready on April 4, 2009, when Gregory decided to take his granddaughter to lunch in his pickup truck. As he was leaving his driveway, Gregory spotted Lieutenant Burnett about twenty yards away.

Gregory stopped his car and removed his seatbelt to reach the on switch for his camera. Lieutenant Burnett pulled alongside the pickup truck and demanded to see Gregory's license. After pointing out he was on his own property, Gregory produced his license and complained about the traffic stops.
GREGORY: I'll tell you this: You're gonna quit this harassment.
BURNETT: Do what?
GREGORY: You're gonna quit this harassing me, because I ain't done nothing illegal.
BURNETT: Well, let's see here. Your window is tinted. And you're getting ready to get out here, and you didn't have your seat belt on. So I can stop you now. Okay?
GREGORY: Where you see my windows tinted at? Where you see my windows tinted at?
BURNETT: Look right here. Look right here. You can't even see through that.
GREGORY: Well, I can't help it that you got them dark glasses on and can't see nothing.
BURNETT: I'll tell you what. I'm gonna take you to jail for menacing.
Gregory was searched, given a seatbelt ticket and arrested for menacing and disorderly conduct. Gregory spent three hours in jail.

After seeing video of the incident, Bell County Prosecutor Neil Ward dropped the charges. Although the US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky rejected Gregory's malicious prosecution lawsuit against Lieutenant Burnett, a three-judge appellate panel reinstated it.

"A review of the tape shows that Gregory did nothing that would legitimately constitute either disorderly conduct or menacing," the panel wrote in its decision. "Gregory had a protected right to request that Burnett stop harassing him, and a jury could conclude both that Burnett's conduct in arresting Gregory was in response to Gregory's exercising that right and that the arrest would deter a person of ordinary firmness from exercising that right."

The appellate court cleared the way for Gregory's claims to be resolved by a jury at trial. Instead of sanctioning Lieutenant Burnett for his conduct, Kentucky State Police promoted him to captain in 2012 and put him in command of all troopers in Bell, Harlan and Knox counties last year.

A copy of the decision is available in a 300k PDF file at the source link below.

Electrical engineer tased at his housewarming party sues Madison County deputies

By Challen Stephens | cstephens@al.com 
Email the author | Follow on Twitter 
on March 02, 2015 at 5:11 PM, updated March 02, 2015 at 10:58 PM

Dominique Kenebrew says he was celebrating the purchase of a new home just outside Huntsville when sheriff's deputies knocked on the door, refused to say why they were there, tried to enter the home and tased Kenebrew in the back when he refused to let them in.

Kenebrew, an electrical engineer, today sued two Madison County deputies and Sheriff Blake Dorning in federal court for illegal search, illegal seizure and excessive force.
The complaint filed today states Deputy Daniel Dejong "shot Kenebrew in the back with his taser, delivering a five-second electrical shock... pulled the taser trigger two more times, delivering two more five-second electrical shocks."

Kenebrew was arrested, taken to jail and charged with obstructing government operations. He was later acquitted.
The encounter took place on Kenebrew's front porch on May 18, 2013, as about 25 to 30 guests were inside the home on Somerset Park Drive, just over Chapman Mountain in northeast Huntsville.
The suit says guests included a nurse, two college instructors, a graduate student and a store manager, "all successful individuals, either gainfully employed or completing their education."
"Kenebrew and his guests were also African-American," reads the suit.
Was race a factor? "I really don't want to go that route," said Kenebrew, 28, on the phone today. But he added: "I don't think they expected me to be the owner of the house."
The lawsuit and the police incident reports largely agree on basic facts.
It was around 11 p.m. Deputy Dejong knocked, Kenebrew stepped outside. Kenebrew closed the door behind him and asked what officers wanted. Police did not have a search warrant. Kenebrew refused to grant them permission to enter the house.

The stories differ on some of the details of what happened next.
The suit alleges deputies repeatedly informed him they wanted to search the home, but would not provide a reason and tried to walk around Kenebrew. "He said I'm going in the house," recalled Kenebrew on the phone today.

Dejong instead wrote that he had seen inside the door and had noticed liquor, beer and what he thought might be under-aged drinkers.

 "I once again advised the suspect that I needed to check on the welfare and ages of the persons inside the residence, and that at this point, I was not asking his permission to enter," reported Dejong.

Since Kenebrew would not grant permission, Dejong wrote that he tried to force his way in, but Kenebrew puffed his chest and blocked the way.

Dejong wrote that he tried to grab Kenebrew's wrist and pin his arms behind him, but Kenebrew was too big and turned his body to block the door. Dejong notes that Kenebrew never raised his hands nor threatened deputies.

The suit puts it this way: "Kenebrew refused permission each time and asked what the problem was."

Finding he couldn't move Kenebrew, Deputy Dejong wrote that he backed up and drew his stun gun.
Both accounts agree that twice a guest opened the door and Kenebrew told the guests to go back inside.

According to the suit, the second time a guest peeked out, Kenebrew turned and "Dejong shot Kenebrew in the back."

The suit also names Deputy Ryan Countess. The suits contends Countess stood by on the porch, where could have intervened to stop "the use of obviously excessive force, yet did nothing."

Dejong writes that he was waiting as the stun gun "was cycling through the boot-up procedure" and fired when it was ready. He also notes he fired into Kenebrew's back.
Dejong wrote that he stunned him twice more when Kenebrew did not respond to commands to roll over and put his hands behind his back.

After stunning Kenebrew, Madison County deputies entered the home. They handcuffed two guests, according to the suit, "all without a warrant, probable cause or reasonable suspicion."
Dejong says they waited on backup. Kenebrew said there were about 10 deputies there already.

All agree they found nothing illegal.
There were no minors at the housewarming.
"It was determined that the patrons inside the house were not violating any laws within the residence," wrote Dejong in the original police report.

The suit contends that Deputy Dejong said deputies were responding to a noise complaint, although the suit claims that is likely fiction, that Kenebrew at that time only had in his home one wireless speaker "incapable of disturbing the peace even on maximum volume."
As for Dejong's written statement that they entered to see if Kenebrew's guests were old enough to drink alcohol, the suit says deputies never checked driver's licenses of the guests.
The suits says a different officer told Kenebrew that the deputies were responding to a complaint about a blocked driveway. Deputies did make some guests move their cars.
"The suspect was arrested for obstructing my investigation," wrote Dejong.
On Nov. 13, 2013, Madison County District Judge Allison Austin found Kenebrew not guilty of obstructing a government operation. 

"Dejong's use of force was completely unnecessary and was excessive," argues the suit in U.S. District Court, claiming illegal search, excessive force and illegal arrest in violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment.

Kenebrew is represented by civil rights attorney Hank Sherrod, who last year represented Robert Bryant of Kelso, Tennessee.

Sherrod argued that Madison County deputies in the summer of 2012 conspired to stalk, beat and falsely arrest Bryant. Bryant sued Sheriff Dorning and eight deputies, including Countess, in federal court last year.

The county settled with Bryant for $625,000 last year and the FBI then announced it was investigating the deputies.

This lawsuit invokes the Bryant case and related newspaper articles to argue that Dorning and the Madison County Sheriff's Department have a record of ignoring or even covering up police misconduct. The suit claims the department did not investigate the Kenebrew incident.

Sheriff Dorning could not be reached for comment late Monday.
"Deputies under Dorning's command have learned that their justifications for using force and other unlawful actions will never be questioned," reads the Kenebrew suit, "and that they can act with impunity."

Friday, January 16, 2015

Judge Dismisses Brooklyn Gun Case as Police Are Investigated


A Brooklyn man who claimed the police manufactured gun-possession charges against him had his case dismissed on Thursday, amid two investigations into the practices of a group of police officers in the 67th Precinct in East Flatbush.

The man, Jeffrey Herring, had maintained his innocence ever since his arrest on June 4, 2013, asserting that officers had planted the gun on him and fabricated the circumstances of his arrest.

The officers claimed that they got a tip from a confidential informer that Mr. Herring had a gun. Prosecutors had been instructed to bring the informer to court on Thursday; the defense had challenged whether that informer even existed.

At the hearing, prosecutors offered no evidence or mention of that informer.

“Based upon information provided to us by defense counsel” and on the office’s own investigation, said Paul Burns, an assistant district attorney, “we do not believe at this time that we can prove beyond a reasonable doubt the charges against Mr. Herring.”

Justice Dineen Riviezzo of State Supreme Court dismissed and sealed the case, saying she was “glad to hear there’s an ongoing investigation.”

In researching the case, a lawyer for Mr. Herring, Debora Silberman of Brooklyn Defender Services, found others that mirrored it, involving the same group of police officers. In the other cases, defendants also said the guns were planted, with the police saying that officers saw the suspects storing the guns in plastic bags or handkerchiefs.

After the arrests, more similarities arose: The use of confidential informers was suddenly mentioned months into the proceedings, and the informers were never produced in court even after judges’ and lawyers’ requests. Judges had called some of the police version of events “incredible,” and the accounts “extremely evasive.”

The Brooklyn district attorney, Kenneth P. Thompson, said, “We will investigate the arrest of Mr. Herring and other arrests by these officers because of the serious questions raised by this case.”

After inquiries from The New York Times, the Police Department opened an Internal Affairs Bureau investigation into the officers’ conduct.

As the charges were dismissed, Mr. Herring, 53, a rangy man dressed in gray slacks and a blue oxford, brought his hands up to his face, his eyes tearing up. If convicted of the top charge of gun possession, he could have faced up to 15 years in prison.

In 2013, Mr. Herring was arrested as he stood next to his bike outside his apartment on a sunny afternoon. He had just gone shopping, and had several plastic bags with him.

The police said Mr. Herring reached into a white plastic bag, removed a gun, put it in a black plastic bag and tossed that bag into the bushes as a plainclothes officer watched him.

Mr. Herring says he lives a quiet, nonviolent life, mostly taking care of his collie, Snowy. His last arrest, for drugs, was in 1997; he says he has been clean since then.

Eight months into the case, prosecutors gave defense lawyers papers showing that the police had requested a $1,000 tip for a confidential informer in this case. The informer had given a highly detailed description, according to the police paperwork, saying “one male black” matching Mr. Herring’s approximate age, height, weight, skin color, hairstyle and outfit, standing where Mr. Herring was standing, “near a bike with several shopping bags,” was carrying a firearm “believed to be a .380 caliber semiautomatic” that was “inside of a shopping bag.”

Police officers arrived about 10 minutes after the call. Mr. Herring “had conveniently not moved an inch, and then like clockwork, chose to display exactly what the supposed C.I. had described at exactly the right time,” Ms. Silberman and another lawyer, Scott Hechinger, wrote in a filing.

The officers involved in Mr. Herring’s case have had their conduct and methods questioned before. One, Lt. Edward Babington, had testified along with other officers in a federal case including a gun charge, prompting District Judge Dora L. Irizarry to call the officers’ testimony “just incredible, and I say ‘incredible’ as a matter of law,” adding that she believed “these officers perjured themselves.” In another federal gun case, prosecutors said they considered Lieutenant Babington to have given inconsistent testimony.

Leaving court on Thursday, Mr. Herring said, “I dreamed of this day.” However, he said, he was still thinking about two other defendants accused of gun possession by these police officers; while Mr. Herring had been out on bail as he fought his case, others spent far more time in jail.

One man, Eugene Moore, could not afford bail. He spent a year in jail until a hearing in which a judge said he did not find the testimony from a detective, Gregory Jean-Baptiste, “to be credible” and dismissed and sealed the case. Another man, John Hooper, also spent almost a year in jail after his arrest. After a hearing in which a justice said he found it “incredible that they thought it was a gun,” speaking of the officers, prosecutors offered Mr. Hooper time served and he accepted.

“I look at my journey, but they were incarcerated,” Mr. Herring said.

A version of this article appears in print on January 16, 2015, on page A21 of the New York edition with the headline: A Gun Case Is Dismissed as the Police Face Inquiries. Order Reprints| Today's Paper|Subscribe

Thursday, January 15, 2015

Police Cruiser Responding to Call Strikes, Kills Boy: Police

By David Chang

Monday, Dec 29, 2014 • Updated at 7:42 AM EST

A 10-year-old boy who was walking to a friend's home for a sleepover was struck and killed by a police cruiser Sunday night in Franklin Township, Gloucester County, New Jersey.
The child's family told NBC10 the boy was walking with two of his friends on Delsea Drive and Paul Street. The boy was crossing the street to attend a sleepover when he was suddenly struck by a Franklin Township Police cruiser passing by. Police told NBC10 the officer was responding to a call.
Man Struck, Killed by Car in New Jersey
The boy later died from his injuries. The boy's two friends were not hurt and are currently being interviewed by detectives.
Family members and a witness claimed the police cruiser was traveling fast and did not have on any lights or a siren at the time of the accident. Investigators did not confirm nor deny that the use of the vehicle's lights and siren.

The police officer was taken to Kennedy Hospital though officials have not yet revealed whether he was injured.
"The matter is currently under investigation," said Gloucester County Chief of Detectives John Porter. "We offer our deepest condolences to the family of that child."

http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/local/Child-Struck-Killed-by-Car-in-Franklin-Twp--286975061.html?_osource=SocialFlowTwt_PHBrand

10-Year-Old Struck, Killed by Cop's Car in New Jersey; Mother Intends To Sue

Michelle Harding said she will sue the Franklin Township Police Officer cleared of wrongdoing in the death of her son.


By January 15, 2015 at 7:49am

he mother of a 10-year-old boy who was killed in an accident involving a Franklin Township Police Officer intends to sue the township after the officer was cleared of wrongdoing in the accident.
Franklin Township Patrolman Nicholas Locilento was responding to a call when he hit 10-year-old Matthew McCloskey while McCloskey was crossing Route 47 around 7 p.m. Dec. 28, 2014. McCloskey was pronounced dead at the scene.
Locilento was speeding, at a rate of 74 mph in a 50 mph zone, and didn’t have his emergency lights on, NBC 10 reports.
Police are not required to activate emergency warning lights when responding to a non-emergency call, as Locilento was.
McCloskey’s mother, Michelle Harding, intends to sue Locilento, according to the report.
“I am genuinely upset that the prosecutor’s office was making a concerted effort to place blame on my beautiful child trying to play in his neighborhood instead of the grown responsible adults hired to protect Matthew,” Harding told NBC 10.
McCloskey was one of three children involved in a foot race to his friends’ home, crossing Route 47 in the process. Police said Locilento attempted to break before hitting McCloskey, but was unable to. He also exited his patrol car and attempted to save McCloskey, police said.
An investigation conducted by the Gloucester County Prosecutor’s Office has cleared Locilento, who has been on administrative leave since the incident and is under administrative review.